Blog

We keep you up to date on the latest tax changes and news in the industry.

Understanding Michigan’s Controversial New Marijuana Tax Law

The state of Michigan has found itself in the spotlight of a significant cannabis policy debate. The controversy revolves around the introduction of a 24% wholesale marijuana tax, which has been legally contested on constitutional grounds. As the judicial proceedings commence, this case is garnering national interest due to its potential ramifications on cannabis pricing and possible implications for voter-endorsed legislation and tax policy nationwide.

Irrespective of whether you are a cannabis consumer or reside far from Michigan, the outcome of this case could set precedents affecting how states across the U.S. design, adjust, and defend their cannabis taxation schemes. This could foreshadow ensuing legal skirmishes as the cannabis market expands.

Image 1

An Overview of Michigan's Approach

As part of the fiscal budget for 2025-2026, Michigan's legislative body endorsed a 24% wholesale tax on cannabis. This initiative aimed to generate revenue for road enhancement projects. The tax is intended to apply at an earlier stage in the supply chain, before cannabis products reach dispensary shelves. Currently, Michigan's taxation comprises:

  • A 10% excise tax on retail cannabis transactions, sanctioned by voters in 2018.

  • A 6% state sales tax. Should the wholesale tax come into force, it would mark one of the most comprehensive cannabis tax structures in the United States.

Why the Legal Challenge?

The Michigan Cannabis Industry Association (MCIA) has branded the tax as unconstitutional. Their contention is based on the notion that:

The 2018 voter-approved cannabis law should not be amended without a supermajority vote.

The legalization of recreational cannabis through the Michigan Regulation and Taxation of Marihuana Act (MRTMA) provided these protections. Legislative amendments require a three-fourths supermajority, yet the tax was passed with a simple majority.

Rose Tantraphol, the MCIA spokesperson, underscored these stakes in comments reported by Michigan Advance:

“As the leading cannabis trade association, we’re here in court fighting to protect the will of Michigan voters.” (Source: Michigan Advance)

Industry groups also warn the tax would elevate operational costs, burden small enterprises, and could potentially redirect consumers to unregulated markets—a pattern observable in high-tax jurisdictions like California.

Image 2

State's Defense on the Tax

Michigan's administration defends the tax by asserting that:

  • The wholesale tax is distinct and not a revision of the 2018 voter-endorsed cannabis law.

  • The legislature possesses the authority to institute taxes to meet budgetary demands.

  • The primary aim is to bolster transport infrastructure rather than amend cannabis policy.

Should the judicial system rule in the state's favor, the tax is scheduled to be enacted on January 1, 2026.

Implications for Consumers

Americans nationwide should remain vigilant, as cannabis tax frameworks often influence each other across state lines. If the tax withstands the legal test:

  • Wholesale prices could escalate.

  • Retail prices might rise in response.

  • Some consumers may be driven towards less costly unregulated markets.

  • Smaller operators might experience pressure or begin to consolidate.

Conversely, if the tax is invalidated, Michigan's current tax arrangement—already among the more cost-effective models nationally—would remain unaltered.

Broad National Significance

Although Michigan is the focal point, the implications of this lawsuit resonate beyond regional confines.

1. It challenges the resilience of voter-sanctioned laws

If legislators can introduce taxes absent a supermajority mandate, this may reshape the operational framework of ballot initiatives in states employing them.

2. It might impact other states' cannabis tax frameworks

States lacking sufficient infrastructure funding might explore comparable taxes if Michigan's persists.

3. It underlines a nationwide concern: disparate cannabis taxes

In states like Oregon and Michigan, modest cannabis taxes help legal items remain competitive, while areas such as California grapple with hefty taxes that sustain thriving illicit markets.

This Michigan legal challenge could set a benchmark for tax disputes in other jurisdictions.

Next Steps in the Legal Process

A Michigan Court of Claims judge has listened to initial arguments and is poised to render a verdict shortly. The case might ascend to the Michigan Supreme Court for final adjudication.

Irrespective of the outcome, this ruling will hold enormous sway—not solely for Michigan's cannabis sector but also for the broader discourse on voter-empowered legislation, burgeoning sectors, and fiscal governance across the U.S.

Share this article...

Sign up for our newsletter.

Each month, we will send you a roundup of our latest blog content covering the tax and accounting tips & insights you need to know.

I confirm this is a service inquiry and not an advertising message or solicitation. By clicking “Submit”, I acknowledge and agree to the creation of an account and to the and .

We care about the protection of your data.