Blog

We keep you up to date on the latest tax changes and news in the industry.

Rhode Island's 'Taylor Swift Tax': Impact on Luxury Homes

The term "Taylor Swift Tax" may sound humorous at first, but it's part of a significant discussion on housing policy in Rhode Island. This proposed tax aims to add a surcharge to luxury second homes not primarily occupied by their owners.

According to Realtor.com, properties valued above $1 million face an added $2.50 per $500 of value above that threshold. For instance, a $2 million property could see an additional $5,000 in property taxes annually. Effective from July 2026, this policy includes adjustments for inflation starting in mid-2027, with exemptions for properties rented out for more than 183 days per year.

Understanding the "Taylor Swift Tax" Moniker

Despite its playful nickname originating from media coverage, the tax is serious in scope, symbolized by Taylor Swift's nearly $17 million mansion that would face a $136,000 increase in taxes. The estate, named High Watch, has a storied past dating back to the Snowden oil family and later, Rebekah Harkness.

Image 2

Lawmakers' Perspective

Senator Meghan Kallman supports the measure, emphasizing fairness and the need to generate state revenue for essential services. As these luxury homes are often owned by out-of-state buyers, their contributions to the local economy are limited.

Supporters argue that the policy could:

  • Revitalize areas with seasonal vacancies

  • Fund affordable housing through increased tax revenues

Opponents, notably from the real estate sector, warn it might:

  • Reduce investment in high-value properties

  • Depress property values

  • Unfairly affect families with long-standing ties to these homes

The social media buzz around this proposal, especially from figures like Dave Portnoy, has further heightened its visibility.

Future Outlook

Should this proposal pass, property owners have until mid-2026 to either prove occupancy or rent out their properties to avoid the surcharge, serving both as an incentive and a deterrent combined.

Image 1

Rhode Island isn't alone in this initiative. Montana is shifting tax burdens onto non-resident home owners, while California's Measure ULA imposes taxes on luxury home sales. Similar strategies are being explored all across California, including the reversible San Francisco Empty Homes Tax.

As cities navigate these policy waters, combining tax tools could potentially stabilize local economies. While the "Taylor Swift Tax" may sound whimsical, it's a serious attempt to address real estate challenges. The outcome will resonate with those interested in housing and economic policies alike.

Share this article...

Sign up for our newsletter.

Each month, we will send you a roundup of our latest blog content covering the tax and accounting tips & insights you need to know.

I confirm this is a service inquiry and not an advertising message or solicitation. By clicking “Submit”, I acknowledge and agree to the creation of an account and to the and .

We care about the protection of your data.